Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 15:46

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Cognitive changes before DBS not a dementia risk factor in Parkinson’s - Parkinson's News Today
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Flyers Acquire Trevor Zegras From Anaheim - NHL.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
DF Weekly: Why would Microsoft "sideline" its next generation handheld? - Eurogamer
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Royals share new photos of Prince William with children - BBC
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.